Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection Research Articles

Two-Team Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision and En Bloc Resection of the Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes, Main Iliac Vessels, and Pelvic Plexus for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis.

Here, we describe the precise surgical technique for a novel procedure involving 2-team transanal total mesorectal excision with en bloc lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection combined with resection of the involved main internal iliac vessels and pelvic plexus. From September 2020 to May 2023, 4 patients underwent the procedure at our hospital. The operation time and blood loss were 272 to 412 minutes and 10 to 124mL, respectively. No patients required conversion to open surgery or exhibited Clavien-Dindo grade III or worse postoperative complications, although 2 developed grade II urinary dysfunction. All surgical margins were negative. Our novel 2-team method can facilitate safe and satisfactory surgery, even for highly advanced rectal cancer. The transanal approach offers excellent visibility and operability, even during LPLN and adjacent structure dissection. Furthermore, initial dissection of the distal branches of the iliac vessels prevents excessive lymphatic tissue congestion, facilitating easier, and clearer dissection.

[The clinical significance of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection].

Objectives: This study aims to explore the clinical significance of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) and evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of this technique to predict the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Methods: The clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, lymph node findings and perioperative complications of 16 rectal cancer patients who underwent SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic LLND in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College during April 2017 and October 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The patients did not receive preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and presented with LPLNs but without LPLN enlargement (MRI showed the maximum short axes of the LPLNs were ≥5 mm and <10 mm at first visit). Results: All 16 patients were successfully performed SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic LLND. Three patients underwent bilateral LLND and 13 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 14 patients and the detection rate of SLNs for these patients was 87.5%. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 2 patients and negative results were found in 12 patients by frozen pathological examinations. Among the 14 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLNs were detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLNs. The specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy was 85.7%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This study indicates that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure with good accuracy. This technique may replace preventive LLND for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.

Optimization of treatment strategies based on preoperative imaging features and local recurrence areas for locally advanced lower rectal cancer after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

Local recurrence (LR) is the main cause of treatment failure in locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC). This study evaluated the preoperative risk factors for LR in patients with LALRC to improve the therapeutic strategies. LALRC patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed. The log-rank test was used to assess local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and multivariate Cox regression was used to identify the prognostic risk factors for LRFS. Follow-up imaging data were used to classify LR according to the location. Overall, 376 patients were enrolled, and 8.8% (n=33) of these patients developed LR after surgery. Multivariate analysis identified positive clinical circumferential resection margin (cCRM) as an independent prognostic factor for LRFS (HR: 4.94; 95% CI, 1.75-13.94; P=0.003). The most common sites for LR were the pelvic plexus and internal iliac area (PIA) (54.5%), followed by the central pelvic area (CPA) (39.4%) and obturator area (OA) (6.1%). Following a subgroup analysis, LR in the OA was not associated with positive cCRM. Patients treated with upfront surgery (n=35, 14.1%) had a lower cCRM positive rate when compared with patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (n=12, 23.5%). However, the LR rate in the nCRT group was still lower (n=28, 36.4%) than that in the upfront surgery group (n=35, 14.%). Among patients with positive cCRM, the LR rate in patients with nCRT remained low (n=3, 10.7%). Positive cCRM is an independent risk factor for LR after TME plus LPND in LALRC patients. LPND is effective and adequate for local control within the OA regardless of cCRM status. However, for LALRC patients with positive cCRM, nCRT should be considered before LPND to further reduce LR in the PIA and CPA.

Can neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before lateral pelvic lymph node dissection improve local control and prognosis in rectal cancer patients with clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis? A multicenter lateral node study in China

AimsSelective lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer is widely recognized. This study aimed to determine the effects of nCRT before LPND on local control and prognosis of rectal cancer patients.Materials and methodsData were retrieved from a prospective database for rectal cancer patients with clinical LPN metastasis receiving total mesorectal excision and LPND at three institutions between January 2012 and December 2019. Selection bias was minimized using propensity score matching (PSM) and short-term and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsPatients (n = 213) were enrolled and grouped as either nCRT (n = 97) or non-nCRT (n = 116). PSM was used to identify 83 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, nCRT patients had a longer operation duration (310.6 vs. 265.0 min, P = 0.001), lower pathological LPN metastasis rate (32.5% vs. 48.2%, P = 0.040), and fewer harvested lymph nodes (22 vs. 25, P = 0.018) compared to the non-nCRT group. However, after PSM, the two groups had similar estimated overall 3-year survival (79.5% vs. 80.7%, P = 0.922), 3-year disease-free survival (66.1% vs. 65.5, P = 0.820), and 3-year local recurrence-free survival (88.6% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.927). Distant metastasis was the predominant recurrence pattern in the overall (45/58, 77.6%) and matched (33/44, 75.0%) cohorts.ConclusionsLPND without nCRT is effective and sufficient in preventing local recurrence in patients with LPN metastases. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Since systemic metastasis is the predominant recurrence pattern in patients with LPN metastasis post-LPND, improved perioperative systemic chemotherapy is needed to prevent micrometastasis.

Recurrence in the pelvic side wall after lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

49 Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer poses a persistent challenge due to the risk of local recurrence, which impacts patient outcomes and quality of life. To address this, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) has emerged as a surgical approach to improve local control. However, comprehensive studies evaluating the outcomes and patterns of recurrence after LPND are limited. This retrospective study aimed to fill this gap and provide insights into the effectiveness of LPND. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 515 patients diagnosed with stage II-III lower rectal cancer who underwent TME and LPND between January 2005 and August 2022. Clinicopathological data were collected, and tumor staging followed the TNM classification system. Recurrence patterns, survival rates, and factors influencing lateral pelvic recurrence were assessed. Results: In our cohort, 18.8% of patients had pathologically positive lateral lymph nodes. Patients with lateral lymph node metastasis exhibited significantly lower 5-year relapse-free survival (31.6%) and overall survival (47.8%) rates compared to those without metastasis (69.5% and 84.7%, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in 20.1% of all patients, with 6.7% experiencing lateral pelvis recurrence (LPR) and 17.4% central pelvis recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified age over 75, lateral lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent risk factors for LPR. Conclusions: Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection remains a valuable tool in managing locally advanced rectal cancer. Our findings underscore the importance of surgeon expertise in performing LPND and the potential benefits of combining treatments to further reduce lateral recurrence. LPND should continue to be explored and refined to enhance patient outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after total mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic node dissection for lower rectal cancer.

50 Background: The standard strategy for lower rectal cancer (LRC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries. TME with or without lateral pelvic node dissection (LND) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for LRC in Japan. However, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for LRC after TME without LND remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for LRC after TME without LND. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent R0 resection by TME without LND and received adjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2020 at our institution. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 20 years; histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma; pathological stage III (UICC 8th); lower rectal cancer (Ra/Rb); patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection without LND and no prior treatment before surgery. We evaluated relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LRC. Prognostic impact of location, adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, T factor, and N factor on RFS was explored by a multivariate analysis. Results: From a total of 197 patients, 117 patients were eligible. Median age was 65 years (range 26–82) and 54 patients (46%) were male. Tumor location was 67 (57%)/50 (43%) for Ra/Rb and pathologic stage was 47(40%) /61(52%)/ 9(8%) for IIIA/IIIB/IIIC. Eighty patients (68%) received fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (single agent) and 37 patients (32%) received oxaliplatin based therapy (doublet) as adjuvant chemotherapy. The 3-year RFS rate and 3-year OS rate were 70.7% (95% CI, 59.0-81.1%) and 94.5% (95% CI, 89.0-98.1%). The 3-year RFS rates according to tumor location (Ra/Rb) and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (single agent/doublet) were 76.9%/70.7% and 71.8%/68.5%, respectively. The 3-year RFS rates based on pathological stage (IIIA/IIIB/IIIC) were 76.7%/68.4%/64.8%. In a multivariate analysis, T3/4 were identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: TME without LND followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LRC demonstrated favorable 3-year RFS rate. adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after TME without LND suggested no additive efficacy of oxaliplatin on RFS.

Total neoadjuvant therapy using short course radiation with or without SIB to lateral pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced ugly rectal cancer.

30 Background: Optimal management for lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) in Ugly locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown &amp; is associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesise that total neo-adjuvant (TNT) using Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with SIB to lateral pelvic lymph nodes would improve outcomes. Methods: All consecutive patients of LARC with LPLN treated with SCRT-based TNT from Jan 2021 – Dec 2022 were reviewed (IEC No: 4116). The LPLN (external, internal, common iliac or obturator) was considered radiologically significant based on joint clinic review with classical criteria. They were divided into two groups (SIB-IMRT: up to 30Gy/5#; or not). The chemotherapy schedule was similar to RAPIDO study, followed by TME +/- LPLN dissection based on radiological response assessed in joint clinic. Two groups were compared for baseline features using Fisher’s exact/Chi-Square tests as appropriate. Outcomes were reviewed for overall response in LPLN (radiological or pathological), disease outcomes &amp; toxicity (acute radiotherapy CTCAE v5, 30-day Clavien Dindo post-surgical, &amp; HRQL EOTRC QLQ-C30). Results: From 398 patients, 83 (20.8%) were identified with LPLN receiving SCRT with TNT, of which 44 (53.01%) received a SIB boost. Overall, 40% were aged ≤ 45 years, 50% had poor histology (signet, PDAC, Mucinous), 35% had EMVI, and 83% were N2+. The two groups had a similar distribution of baseline features (p&gt;0.05) &amp; were matched for poor prognostic factors. The patients who received a boost were 20% more likely to complete TNT and undergo TME than patients who did not (81.8% vs 61.5%; p=0.0099), mainly due to a significantly lesser event of disease progression before surgery, rendering them inoperable (25% vs 33.3%; p=0.024). Boost was associated with an increased overall response at LPLN by 20% (84.1% vs 64.1%; p=0.011) &amp; decreased need for PLND by 15% in patients considered for surgery (15.9% vs 30.56%; p=0.072). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 26 patients (31.33%) identified with disease progression were similarly distributed in two groups with similar patterns (all but one had distant metastasis, of which 6 had loco-regional failures). A total of 17 deaths with a non-significant trend of higher 18-month OS observed (boost: 83.4+6.3 vs 75.6+7.8%; HR:2.29(CI:0.85 - 6.19; p=0.09). None of the patients had acute &gt; grade 3 CTCAE v5 toxicity within 4 weeks of radiotherapy completion. Four (4.8%) deaths were chemotherapy-related, &amp; one post-surgery toxicity with similar &gt; grade 3 Clavien Dindo complications in two arms. EORTC QLQ C-30 PROM scores were similar in two groups. Conclusions: In ugly, poor biology LARC, TNT with SCRT-SIB to LPLN seem safe &amp; feasible with improved response, treatment completion &amp; operability without significantly increase in toxicity rates. Long-term prospective studies are warranted to identify significant survival impact.

Comparing robotic with laparoscopic beyond total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer-a propensity-matched analysis.

Robotic surgery is increasingly being used for rectal resection, with short-term benefits such as reduced hospital stay, faster bowel recovery and fewer complications. However, its utility for advanced rectal cancers requiring beyond total mesorectal excision has not been adequately evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare robotic and laparoscopic approaches for extended rectal resection, with postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes as endpoints. A retrospective, single-centre study of patients with advanced rectal cancer requiring extended rectal resection between January 2017 and December 2022 was carried out. Beyond total mesorectal excisions included pelvic exenteration, en bloc soft tissue or partial organ resection with the rectum, and lateral pelvic node dissection. Propensity score matching in a 4:1 ratio of laparoscopic to robotic was performed with age, sex, comorbidities, body mass index, organs involved, clinical T stage and colonoscopic obstruction. A total of 425 beyond total mesorectal excisions were performed by minimally invasive approaches during the study period, and after propensity matching 228 laparoscopic operations were compared with 57 robotic resections. All baseline characteristics were balanced. No difference in blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, positive resection margin or nodal yield was found, but there was a somewhat longer operating duration in robotics. The 2-year disease-free and overall survival were also similar. No differences in postoperative or short-term oncological outcomes were found between robotic and laparoscopic beyond total mesorectal excisions for advanced tumours when performed by teams experienced in both robotics and laparoscopy.

Total Mesorectal Excision with or without Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer.

Incidence of local recurrence was slightly higher in Group A (8.7%) than in Group B (4.3%) but was not statistically significant. There was no statistical significance between both groups regarding distant metastasis (8.7% in Group A and 13% in Group B). Urinary and sexual dysfunctions were higher in Group B (26.1%) compared to those in Group A (21.7%) but were not statistically significant. The incidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was 30.4%. Also, intraoperative blood loss was higher and operative time was longer in Group B which was statistically significant (P value <0.001). Our conclusion was that prophylactic addition of LPLD to TME was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, although it was numerically better. LPLD is associated with longer operative time and higher intraoperative blood loss.

Tips and tricks for robotic lateral pelvic node dissection.

Lateral pelvic node dissection can be challenging. In addition to detailed anatomical knowledge of the pelvic side wall, surgeons also need to be proficient in performing fine dissection within the confines of this limited operative field. While the incorporation of robotics can facilitate the safe completion of this technically demanding procedure, this is nonetheless dependent on the way the robotic system is used. This video aims to demonstrate several tips and tricks for performing robotic lateral pelvic node dissection.

Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Feasibility Study from a European Centre.

The role of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) for lateral pelvic nodal disease (LPND) in rectal cancer has yet to be investigated in the Western hemisphere. This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of robotic LPLND by utilising a well-established totally robotic TME protocol. We conducted a retrospective study on 17 consecutive patients who underwent robotic LPLND for LPND ± TME for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2021. A single docking totally robotic approach from the left hip with full splenic mobilisation was performed using the X/Xi da Vinci platform. All patients underwent a tri-compartmental robotic en bloc excision of LPND with preservation of the obturator nerve and pelvic nerve plexus, leaving a well-skeletonised internal iliac vessel and its branches. The median operative time was 280 min, which was 40 min longer than our standard robotic TME. The median BMI was 26, and there were no conversions. The median inpatient stay was 7 days with no Clavien-Dindo > 3 complications. One patient (6%) developed local recurrence and metastatic disease within 5 months. The proportion of histologically confirmed LPND was 41%, of which 94% were well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Median pre-operative lateral pelvic node size was significantly higher in positive nodes (14 mm vs. 8 mm (p = 0.01)). All patients had clear resection margins on histology. Robotic LPLND is safe and feasible with good peri-operative and short-term outcomes, with the ergonomic advantages of a robotic TME docking protocol readily transferrable in LPLND.

Problems of preoperative diagnosis of pelvic lymph node lesions in rectal cancer (review)

Background: metastasis in lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) occurred in 6–15% of patients with middle or low rectal cancer. Currently there are still no criteria of diagnosis of this. There is no generally accepted management this group of the patients.Aim: to systematize the available literature data about lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with rectal cancer.Materials and Methods: literature search was performed in the PubMed and e-Library databases using the keywords: LLND, lateral lymph node, rectal cancer, lymphodissection. The search date: July 2023.Results: preoperative CRT with total mesorectumectomy supplemented with selective LTLD for suspected metastases seems to be a rational strategy to achieve a favorable oncological treatment outcome.Conclusion: Additional studies are required.

Sequential Lateral Lymphatic Metastasis Shows Similar Oncologic Outcomes to Upward Spread in Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Whether lateral pelvic node metastasis should be considered as a regional or systemic disease is a long-standing debate. Although previous Japanese studies have considered it to be locoregional disease, Western countries consider it a systemic disease and do not perform lateral pelvic node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. To evaluate whether lateral pelvic node metastasis is a systemic or regional disease that is amenable to curative resection. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. There were 616 consecutive patients who underwent curative total mesorectal excision alone or with lateral pelvic node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer between 2011 and 2019. Three-year disease-free and overall survival. A total of 360 patients underwent total mesorectal excision, and 160 patients underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection. There was no difference in the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.844) or overall survival rates ( p = 0.921) between the groups. Patients with lateral pelvic node metastasis showed DFS similar to those with perirectal lymph node metastasis in the total mesorectal excision group. In a subgroup analysis, patients with internal iliac pelvic node metastasis showed a disease-free survival comparable to those with perirectal node involvement, and patients with other lateral pelvic node metastasis showed a DFS similar to those with intermediate node involvement. In the lateral pelvic node dissection group, the lateral pelvic node metastatic rate was 32.5%. On multivariate analysis, fewer than 8 of the unilateral harvested lateral pelvic nodes and advanced ypT stage were significantly associated with poor disease-free survival. The retrospective design. Lateral lymphatic metastasis showed oncologic outcomes similar to those of upward spread, especially perirectal lymph nodes metastasis. Large cohort studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these results. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Es un debate muy antiguo si las metástasis en los ganglios pélvicos laterales deben considerarse una enfermedad regional o sistémica. Si bien estudios japoneses anteriores las consideran como una enfermedad locorregional, en los países de occidente se las considera como una enfermedad sistémica por la cual no se realiza disección de ganglios pélvicos laterales después de una radioquimioterapia preoperatoria.OBJETIVOS:Evaluar si la metástasis en los ganglios pélvicos laterales se consideran como enfermedad sistémica o enfermedad regional susceptible de resección curativa.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en un centro oncológico terciario.PACIENTES:616 pacientes consecutivos se sometieron a excisión total del mesorrecto curativa sola o con disección de los ganglios pélvicos laterales después de radioquimioterapia preoperatoria en casos de cáncer de recto localmente avanzado entre 2011 y 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Sobrevida global y libre de enfermedad a 3 años.RESULTADOS:Un total de 360 pacientes se sometieron a excisión total del mesorrecto y 160 pacientes se sometieron a excisión total del mesorrecto con disección de ganglios pélvicos laterales.No hubo diferencias en la sobrevida libre de enfermedad a 3 años (p = 0,844) ni en las tasas de sobrevida general (p = 0,921) entre los grupos. Los pacientes con metástasis en los ganglios pélvicos laterales mostraron una sobrevida libre de enfermedad similar a aquellos con metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos perirrectales que se encontraban en el grupo de excisión total del mesorrecto.En el análisis de subgrupos, los pacientes con metástasis en los ganglios pélvicos ilíacos internos mostraron una sobrevida libre de enfermedad comparable a aquellos con afección de los ganglios perirrectales y los pacientes con otras metástasis en los ganglios pélvicos laterales mostraron una sobrevida libre de enfermedad similar a aquellos con afección de los ganglios intermedios.En el grupo de disección de los ganglios pélvicos laterales, la tasa de metástasis en dichos ganglios fué del 32,5%. En el análisis multivariado, < de 8 ganglios pélvicos laterales resecados unilateralmente y el estadio ypT avanzado se asociaron significativamente con una menor sobrevida libre de enfermedad.LIMITACIÓN:El diseño retrospectivo del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Las metástasis linfáticas laterales mostraron resultados oncológicos similares a la diseminación ascendente, especialmente las metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos perirrectales. Se requieren grandes estudios de cohortes con seguimiento a largo plazo para confirmar estos resultados. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Double inferior vena cava, an uncommon but relevant anatomical anomaly in surgery for lower rectal cancer: a report of two cases

BackgroundDouble inferior vena cava (DIVC) is rare and usually detected incidentally. DIVC may be associated with several anatomical variants of the retroperitoneal and pelvic veins. These variants can pose a clinical problem during colorectal surgery. We present two patients with lower rectal cancer who also had a DIVC.Case presentationCase 1 was a 72-year-old man with advanced lower rectal cancer (T3N0M0) who underwent robot-assisted low anterior resection after neoadjuvant therapy. A DIVC was detected on preoperative computed tomography (CT). During the operation, a presacral vein was injured while mobilizing the rectum and hemostasis could not be achieved. We converted to open surgery and packed the pelvic cavity for hemostasis. Retrospective analysis suggested the injured vein arose from an interiliac vein of the presacral pelvic venous plexus. Case 2 was a 50-year-old woman with lower rectal cancer (T3N0M0), immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and a DIVC. Although preoperative three-dimensional CT angiography showed no obvious pelvic vein abnormalities, a short course of preoperative radiotherapy was delivered to avoid lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Chemotherapy was deferred owing to her thrombocytopenic disease. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection was performed meticulously to minimize bleeding and achieve rapid hemostasis. No intraoperative complications occurred.ConclusionDIVC is often accompanied by venous malformations that may pose a problem when mobilizing the mesorectum from the retroperitoneum. Preoperative assessment of pelvic vessel anatomy using three-dimensional CT is essential in patients with a DIVC who undergo rectal surgery.

Role of Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Surgery

AbstractThe role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is a matter of controversy. Surgical practices in Korea and Japan have accepted this approach and are widely utilized; however, it is not routinely incorporated in the practice of countries in the Western hemisphere. This review will examine the role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

MRI-based Radiomics Model for Preoperative Prediction of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis (LPLNM) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 263 patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision and LPLN dissection. Radiomics features from the primary lesion and LPLNs on baseline MRI images were utilized to construct a radiomics model, and their radiomics scores were combined to develop a radiomics scoring system. A clinical prediction model was developed using logistic regression. A hybrid predicting model was created through multivariable logistic regression analysis, integrating the radiomics score with significant clinical risk factors (baseline Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), clinical circumferential resection margin status, and the short axis diameter of LPLN). This hybrid model was presented with a hybrid clinical-radiomics nomogram, and its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness were assessed. A total of 148 patients were included in the analysis and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=104) and an independent internal testing cohort (n=44). The hybrid clinical-radiomics model exhibited the highest discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.843 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.706-0.968]in the testing cohort compared to the clinical model [AUC (95% CI)=0.772 (0.589-0.856)]and radiomics model [AUC (95% CI)=0.731 (0.613-0.849)]. The hybrid prediction model also demonstrated good calibration, and decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical usefulness. This study developed a hybrid MRI-based radiomics model that incorporates a combination of radiomics score and significant clinical risk factors. The proposed model holds promise for individualized preoperative prediction of LPLNM in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Clinical significance of metastatic tumor deposit foci in rectal cancer in the lateral pelvic lymph node area.

Although previous studies have demonstrated that tumor deposits (TDs) are associated with worse prognosis in colon cancer, their clinical significance in rectal cancer has not been fully elucidated, especially in the lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) area. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of TDs, focusing on the number of metastatic foci, including lymph node metastases (LNMs) and TDs, in the LPLN area. This retrospective study involved 226 consecutive patients with cStage II/III low rectal cancer who underwent LPLN dissection. Metastatic foci, including LNM and TD, in the LPLN area were defined as lateral pelvic metastases (LP-M) and were evaluated according to LP-M status: presence (absence vs. presence), histopathological classification (LNM vs. TD), and number (one to three vs. four or more). We evaluated the relapse-free survival of each model and compared them using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance index (c-index). Forty-nine of 226 patients (22%) had LP-M, and 15 patients (7%) had TDs. The median number of LP-M per patient was one (range, 1-9). The best risk stratification power was observed for number (AIC, 758; c-index, 0.668) compared with presence (AIC, 759; c-index, 0.665) and histopathological classification (AIC, 761; c-index, 0.664). The number of LP-M was an independent prognostic factor for both relapse-free and overall survival, and was significantly associated with cumulative local recurrence. The number of metastatic foci, including LNMs and TDs, in the LPLN area is useful for risk stratification of patients with low rectal cancer.

Learning process analysis of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for local advanced rectal cancer: the CUSUM curve of 78 consecutive patients.

Robotic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) has been described as a safe and feasible procedure for local advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve for robotic-assisted LLND. We collected data on 78 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-LLND at our hospital. The learning curve was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to assess changes in the unilateral LLND operative times across the case sequence. Among the 78 patients, 52 underwent bilateral LLND and 26 underwent unilateral LLND. A total of 130 consecutive data were recorded. We arranged unilateral robotic-LLND operative times and calculated cumulative sum values, allowing the differentiation of three phases: phase I (learning period, cases 1-51); phase II (proficiency period, cases 52-83); and phase III (mastery period, cases 84-130). As the learning curve accumulated, the operation time and estimated blood loss of unilateral robotic-LLND decreased significantly with each phase (P < 0.05). By 12months after surgery, the International Prostatic Symptom Score of patients at phase III was significantly lower than at phase I (P < 0.05). The CUSUM curve shows three phases in the learning of robotic-LLND. The estimated learning curve for robotic-assisted rectal-LLND is achieved after 51 cases.

Two-team Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Using Transanal Approach for Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Lateral lymph node dissection is a locally advanced rectal cancer treatment option. Despite its complexities, such as prolonged operative time and increased blood loss, a transanal approach with an abdominal approach may help mitigate these drawbacks. Between July 2013 and June 2022, 40 patients underwent radical laparoscopic surgery with lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Among them, 29 and 11 patients underwent total mesorectal excision and lateral lymph node dissection without transanal approach (conventional surgery) and with transanal approach (two-team surgery), respectively. The clinical findings, surgical outcomes, pathology results, and prognoses of conventional and two-team surgeries were retrospectively compared. Compared to conventional surgery, two-team surgery involves increased organ and nerve resections, shorter operation time (286 vs. 548 min, p<0.001), and less blood loss (20 vs. 158 ml, p<0.001). Although postoperative complications were similar between groups, the two-team surgery group had a shorter hospital stay (p=0.006). Pathologically, all patients who underwent two-team surgery had a distal resection margin of at least 20 mm, and no recurrence was observed. With conventional surgery, 63.6% of patients had a 10-19 mm margin, and 36.4% had a margin of ≥20 mm, except for abdominoperineal resection. Total mesorectal excision and lateral lymph node dissection with the transanal approach as a two-team surgery are safe and feasible. Two-team surgery resulted in better outcomes than conventional surgery regarding operative time, blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and adequate distal resection margin.

Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is a technically demanding procedure. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic LPNDs. This multi-institutional retrospective study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND for locally advanced rectal cancer. There were 74 patients in the laparoscopic and 34 in the robotic groups. The median operation time was longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (353 vs. 275 min, p < 0.001). No patients underwent conversion to open surgery in either group. Pathological LPN metastases were observed in 24 and 8 patients in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.347). Although the number of harvested mesorectal lymph nodes was similar (15.5 vs. 15.0, p = 0.968), the number of harvested LPNs was higher in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (7.0 vs. 5.0, p = 0.004). Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were similar (robotic vs. laparoscopic, 35.3% and 7 days vs. 37.8% and 7 days, respectively). Both laparoscopic and robotic LPND are safe and feasible for locally advanced rectal cancers, but robotic LPND showed more harvested lateral lymph node than laparoscopic LPND.